EVE Search - New Dev Blog: Speed Rebalanced by Nozh

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

New Dev Blog: Speed Rebalanced by Nozh

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 15 post(s)
Amarr Holymight Bat Country Aegis Militia	Posted - 2008.07.30 17:46:00 - [1] Originally by: Predator Irl Having one race virtually unstoppable because of an unfair advantage is just insane..... Caldari can nano too and there is quite a lot of skill involved in manually flying a 10km/s vagabond moreso than hugging a gate in a passive tanked Onyx knowing you can tank a few Vagas til you make your escape. Vagas aren't unstoppable if you actually use the skill you speak of you can catch them, tricky but that's the challenge cause you know if you catch them you have just popped a ship worth a fair price. In this way I admire snaked polycarbed Vaga/other nano pilots as much as I strive to kill them and if they are willing to put that much ISK and training on the line they deserve to be hard to kill. I fly anti-nano Neut Domi as Vitrael above has fallen victim to and I also fly a nano-ishtar from time to time these changes overall as a bundle do absolutely nothing to improve the game. They are so drastic they are leading me to believe that CCP has a problem with how it views its game. As it stands I can take on about four NanoHacs in my neut domi and if I was Caldari I could fit a Raven to do the same job probably more effectively. Obviously they will disengage but I will catch a 100-400 mil Turkey for my work. I like the scram change but increasing its range is too much especially for blasterboats (Before you say anything I am currently training for an Arazu). The web change is also a little extreme though I'm for it. A Nano-Hac/Recon should still be able to outrun medium drones and interceptors should still be able to outrun light drones except while orbiting that could be your balance. Overall speed/inertia decrease as it stands will create a new game of daily blob and even less reds will venture into Providence or similar. Guerilla warfare works both ways it takes skill and a good FC to do it well you can do it too so quit ya whining and find a good PvP corp. If Drake pilots become ubergankmobiles Im quitting you can have all my stuff. Summary some good changes and ideas but really testing stuff on SISI is a whole lot different to TQ encounters so really CCP you will have to use your gut instinct on this one.
Amarr Holymight Bat Country Aegis Militia	Posted - 2008.07.30 21:28:00 - [2] Originally by: McDonALTs Your gang jumps in to chase a nano mach. Nanomach jumps though the gate and you jump with him. nanomach instantly MWDs away at obscene speeds. As soon as you lock the nanomach with your sensor boosted rapier, the Nano mach is around 170km away and sniping you. I am glad CCP is fixing these pathetic tactics and look forward to eve having a fantastic future again. Your main and his friends must be terrible pilots to allow that to happen, I pity you. I have just got off SISI my 200 mil Ishtar couldn't outrun a geddon two hyperions and a megas DPS so I guess at least, I have a good ratting ship or maybe I could use it for lowsec gatecamping. PvP will feel more like missions or large fleet encounters. So I'm just wondering what CCP think a HAC's new role is because I can't see any reason to fly them if I stand to lose that much ISK that easily.
Amarr Holymight Ultrapolite Socialites GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.07.30 21:28:00 - [3] Originally by: McDonALTs Your gang jumps in to chase a nano mach. Nanomach jumps though the gate and you jump with him. nanomach instantly MWDs away at obscene speeds. As soon as you lock the nanomach with your sensor boosted rapier, the Nano mach is around 170km away and sniping you. I am glad CCP is fixing these pathetic tactics and look forward to eve having a fantastic future again. Your main and his friends must be terrible pilots to allow that to happen, I pity you. I have just got off SISI my 200 mil Ishtar couldn't outrun a geddon two hyperions and a megas DPS so I guess at least, I have a good ratting ship or maybe I could use it for lowsec gatecamping. PvP will feel more like missions or large fleet encounters. So I'm just wondering what CCP think a HAC's new role is because I can't see any reason to fly them if I stand to lose that much ISK that easily.
Amarr Holymight Bat Country Aegis Militia	Posted - 2008.07.31 00:51:00 - [4] Originally by: GateScout What a bunch of whiny ***es. Have you ever seen a more pathetic conglomerate of complaining **s? There are valid reasons for altering the method CCP uses to nerf nano ships... So please stop the "I trained my whole career to fly nano ship..." NO ONES CARES. Form valid arguments and maybe (MAYBE!) ccp will listen to you. However, with the insane amount of pure bullshit in this thread, no wonder CCP ignores your whines. Format a semi-decent argument and stop whining...you pathetic shits. Practice what you preach oh and use your main to flame it's unbecoming to do it with an alt.
Amarr Holymight Ultrapolite Socialites GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.07.31 00:51:00 - [5] Originally by: GateScout What a bunch of whiny ***es. Have you ever seen a more pathetic conglomerate of complaining **s? There are valid reasons for altering the method CCP uses to nerf nano ships... So please stop the "I trained my whole career to fly nano ship..." NO ONES CARES. Form valid arguments and maybe (MAYBE!) ccp will listen to you. However, with the insane amount of pure bullshit in this thread, no wonder CCP ignores your whines. Format a semi-decent argument and stop whining...you pathetic shits. Practice what you preach oh and use your main to flame it's unbecoming to do it with an alt.
Amarr Holymight Bat Country Aegis Militia	Posted - 2008.08.06 16:30:00 - [6] Edited by: Amarr Holymight on 06/08/2008 16:30:00 Originally by: Jakzin Originally by: Stab Wounds [Ishtar, shield] Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Caldari Navy Photon Scattering Field Caldari Navy Invulnerability Field Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Dark Blood Small Nosferatu [empty high slot] Core Defence Field Purger II Core Defence Field Purger II Ogre II x5 DPS: 634 Defense: 904 HACs look fine to me after speed nerf. you have to use unconventional pvp fits. This is almost as funny as the guy who said that armor tanking the vaga is a viable alternative and will become the new standard fast. I tried this fit on SISI last week ur basically just flying an expensive Drake with a DPS/Tank tradeoff, whats the point?
Amarr Holymight Ultrapolite Socialites GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.08.06 16:30:00 - [7] Edited by: Amarr Holymight on 06/08/2008 16:30:00 Originally by: Jakzin Originally by: Stab Wounds [Ishtar, shield] Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Shield Power Relay II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Caldari Navy Photon Scattering Field Caldari Navy Invulnerability Field Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Heavy Electron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M Dark Blood Small Nosferatu [empty high slot] Core Defence Field Purger II Core Defence Field Purger II Ogre II x5 DPS: 634 Defense: 904 HACs look fine to me after speed nerf. you have to use unconventional pvp fits. This is almost as funny as the guy who said that armor tanking the vaga is a viable alternative and will become the new standard fast. I tried this fit on SISI last week ur basically just flying an expensive Drake with a DPS/Tank tradeoff, whats the point?

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.